Hi there, It's not a problem from Kid, you would have the same result with XSLT. The problem comes from the way the browser will render XHTML (which is XML) regarding the content-type you set. It should be application/xhtml+xml but it's not because Internet Explorer can't deal with it and thus we are stuck with text/html which is dumb.
The same problem occurs if you try to have several <script /> elements in the head element. If you close them with /> the browser will not understand you are closing them and thus the first one will be interpreted but not the other ones. So: <script type="text/javascript" src="a.js" /> <script type="text/javascript" src="b.js" /> <script type="text/javascript" src="c.js" /> The browser will not see the closing tags and thus will not load b and c. Regarding your problem you can simply add an extra space top your textarea like this: <textarea name="content"> </textarea> Therefore the browser will display correctly the form and the texterea will have a useless space. Regarding the script elements above you'd need to do: <script type="text/javascript" src="a.js"> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="b.js"> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="c.js"> </script> And it would work just fine. XHTML is great but almost useless if one can't use the proper content type with it. Since Microsoft won't support application/xhtml+xml in IE7 we are doomed for quite a while I'm afraid. Hope this helped. - Sylvain Selon "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi all > > I trying changing the output of kid templates to XHTML. And I've got a > problem when trying to render an XHTML form with a textarea field. > > The .kid file renders well if accessed directly throught the browser. > However when I access the same template through TG, the textarea will > contain the code (XHTML) for the following fields of the form. And the > followinf fields of the forms aren't displayed. > > Could this be a bug in the kid outputting XHTML? Also I noted that the > XHTML tags are displayed in upper case. Although this is pretty > straighforward to change, shouldn't it be lower case instead? > > Thanx > > MarcosM > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
