Well, I think you're right, Guyon. After re-reading the particularly
opaque documentation for joins in SQLObject, I'm pretty certain I've
got things backwards.
This will be a real breaking change when I check it in, but it's
really wrong the way it currently is.
Unless someone speaks up and explains why it *ISN'T* wrong after all,
I'm going to check this fix in tomorrow morning.
On 4 Dec, 2005, at 11:00 pm, Jeff Watkins wrote:
Guyon, it may be that when I specified the column names for the
intermediate table I may have confused them. I'll check, and if
it's wrong, I'll fix it.
--
Jeff Watkins
http://newburyportion.com/
"Advertising directed at children is inherently deceptive and
exploits children under eight years of age."
-- American Academy of Pediatrics
