On 12/7/05, Sylvain Hellegouarch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well for sure, like most proposed standards, they usually fall on their > implementation. I didn't mean to say this was a solution that could be replace > what current Javascript toolkits do but it could interest people on the long > run or as you say for specific tasks in closed environment. > > Nevertheless, hopefully it'll be better supported in the coming month and it > could lead to great new features :)
It wouldn't surprise me to see this in Windows Vista, given that Microsoft is pitching native XML interpretation in some of their new compilers (IIRC). > E4X is not well known and I wanted to give a hint about it ;) Cool. It is good to see what people are looking at for the future. I'll stick with JSON for now ;) Kevin
