I wouldn't go that far either. I tend to over-dramatize my points. Though I think my point remains valid. Using 0.8, you'd have to create a lot of functionality that is be built into 0.9. I would prefer to wait it out instead of re-inventing the wheel, then porting it back to the new wheel specification.
On 12/7/05, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/7/05, Jared Kuolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > A big reason I don't like this idea is that the changes between 0.8 > > and 0.9 are so vast, it's comparing apples and oranges. I'm almost to > > the point of telling people not to touch TurboGears until 0.9 because > > so much of what they'll know about 0.8 is going to be different. > > > > Does that make sense? > > Actually, I wouldn't go that far. Everything that one learns for > TurboGears 0.8 is applicable and carries over directly to TurboGears > 0.9. The only backwards incompatible change is that JSON output is not > on by default. 0.9 just *adds* a whole bunch of stuff. People seemed > quite happy with what 0.8 had to offer, so there's no reason to stop > :) > > Kevin > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
