Ticket 181 offers up better request/response objects. I'm going to go with that ticket instead and just make sure that those objects are available and in use.
Kevin On 12/7/05, Kitto Mandala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FYI, a simple hack/workaround got me past this so I could write and > run some tests on my controllers. Posted hack.txt to the below ticket. > > I'm sorry that it's not a real fix -- I have no clue how cherrypy works. > > --Kitto > > On Dec 2, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Kevin Dangoor wrote: > > > > > This would be this ticket: > > http://trac.turbogears.org/turbogears/ticket/70 > > > > Kevin > > > > On 12/2/05, programmer.py <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> File > >> "c:\python24\lib\site-packages\cherrypy-2.1.0-py2.4.egg\cherrypy > >> \__init__ > >> .py", line 69, in __getattr__ > >> childobject = getattr(serving, self.__attrname__) > >> AttributeError: 'thread._local' object has no attribute 'response' > >> > -- Kevin Dangoor Author of the Zesty News RSS newsreader email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] company: http://www.BlazingThings.com blog: http://www.BlueSkyOnMars.com
