On 12/8/05, David Guaraglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, now that we are on the topic, I think that something that would > make a big difference is making the front page more accesible. In fact, > those are not the correct words, what I mean is "make the content more > accesible to the user". For example, the trac page can only be found > after you navigated inside a few links, and that, for someone with the > attention span of a mosquito (my case) is too much.
But we're not on that topic :) We could start a separate thread for bouncing ideas around for the website contents. > Besides that, I like the new logo. In fact I think that the 'G' there is > enough as logo, because using the whole 'TurboGears" thing seems > overkill (and in my opinion a tad skinny, logos now come in > extra-extra-bold). Of course, I'm just a mere mortal more akin to > programming than design, so any designer's view on this should > automatically override my opinion. Ahh... we *are* on this topic. The Planet site makes use of just the G. I do like having the G in the context of the whole word as well (Ronald has used it to good effect as well.) > And last (but not least) I think that a little demo application, even > the 20mn wiki, running on the server would make a lot of difference. > Static pages are nice when you don't have something like TG to make them > dynamic ;) Most of the pages will continue to be static, because they work just fine. But, putting useful dynamic stuff up seems like a good idea and is something I'm thinking about. Kevin
