| Lee, this is a really interesting idea. I hadn't considered it at all when I originally developed the identity framework. However, I agree with Kevin, it's a really good use-case and I'd like to make it work. So I need a little more clarification: Do you want only one set of permissions? Or will the two controllers be completely disjoint? Meaning, the users from controller A will have no permissions in controller B unless they have separately authenticated? Frankly, I don't like the disjoint users idea. I'd rather look at a single-sign-on style solution. Maybe with a cross provider credentialing scheme. I'll give this some thought in the next few days, but I *am* a little distracted right now: <http://newburyportion.com/2005/12/molly-elizabeth-watkins>. Lee, I'd be delighted to chat with you a little about your ideas. Feel free to drop me an email... On 9 Dec, 2005, at 10:15 am, Lee McFadden wrote:
-- Jeff Watkins "Advertising directed at children is inherently deceptive and exploits children under eight years of age." -- American Academy of Pediatrics |
- [TurboGears] Re: Identity: Multiple authentication types Jeff Watkins

