David Stanek wrote:
> On 12/10/05, Kevi
> But I am not sure how good of an idea this would be. I'll bring it up on the
> Kid mailing list after I think about it for a bit.

I brought it up on there a few days ago, and I think the developers
value the "always-valid-XML" feature quite highly.  Personally I think
that's just a checklist feature and doesn't actually help developers.
The "able to write actual Python in your templates" is a much more
valuable feature to me, so I'd like to see it changed...

Reply via email to