On 12/20/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only trouble I am having has to do with SQLObjects licensing (since > python's bytecode generation is compiling in my view) and this leaves > things ambiguous with any project code generated (as far as SQLObjects > LGPL licensing). Personally, I believe SQLObjects is a great object > relational wrapper and I like it a lot. I wish the licensing were > different but I don't think that is about to change any time soon.
That's a very interesting read of the LGPL. I'd also prefer it if SQLObject were MIT/BSD licensed, but that may be a difficult switch at this point. However, I don't think Ian Bicking's interpretation of the LGPL and how it applies to users of SQLObject is the same as yours. Ian's on this list so maybe he can comment, but I'm pretty sure that there is nothing to fear in using SQLObject. Kevin
