On 12/22/05, Jonathan LaCour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would have to agree here that I think Karl's layout would be better > for a brochure, magazine, or any medium other than a website. Its > just plain too crowded for the web.
The move to blue was a good one, but the move from 2 columns to 3 was not: http://gr.ayre.st/~grayrest/tgwebsite2.png http://gr.ayre.st/~grayrest/tgwebsite3-blue.png Taking a look at the post-1.0 Rails site, you can see that it's about as un-crowded as it gets, and yet it's pretty effective. I do think that having a dynamic page that shows what's going on in the project at a glance is a good thing, and I also think that screen real estate can be used a little better to highlight special things (like the current turbogears.org's sidebar, which is not always used to full-effect). > I think Richard's latest layout is perfect, both in terms of color > and whitespace. Its easy to read, attractive, and not too full of > graphics. Can you be more specific when you say "Richard's latest layout"? http://koorb.co.uk/static/images/tglogos/layouts/layout-1.png http://koorb.co.uk/static/images/tglogos/layouts/layout-2.png http://koorb.co.uk/static/images/tglogos/layouts/layout-3.png layout 3 has a gray band at the right that is screaming out for *something* to happen there. I like the bottom half of layout 3, but prefer the top half of layout 2. Kevin
