Jeff Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Although it's more work, I'd definitely favour option #1. It just *feels* like > the right answer. Especially because of the multiple connections issue. I > can easily envision the existence of other packages which contain their own > hubs, and if each hub opens a new connection, that'll play merry hell with > packages like Oracle (which were licensed by the connection back when I was > using it).
I agree with you that limiting the number of connections is more interesting. Specially if one starts using proprietary RDBMSs or alternative storage systems. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
