On 1/1/06, Karl Guertin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/1/06, Robin Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I love svk: it lets me take my laptop and hack away even when I don't > > have a wireless connection, and I can still commit. > > Sounds fairly similar, does the push cause all the changes to be > coalesced into a single patch? Darcs would push each patch, hence the > unrecord/record dance if you want them to appear as one big patch in > the upstream repo. Distributed RCS systems are so much better than > central repo stystems.
By default, each commit you made on your local copy becomes a separate commit on the remote end. You can do "svk push --lump" if you want to lump the changes together as a single commit on the remote end. If you don't have write access to the remote repository (say you're submitting a change to TurboGears and you haven't been added as an SVN committer yet) you'd do "svk push --lump --patch" to create a patch of your changes, which you could then email to the project's list, or put on its patch tracker, or whatever. -- Robin Munn [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key 0xD6497014
