What I meant was that as I understood you the new config file would be
python but the old cfg's would be ini
On 1/3/06, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1/3/06, Elvelind Grandin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like a great idea, but i'm not sure it's that good to use two
> > different config formats (py and ini).
>
> Hmm... there certainly could be an ini file that goes along with your
> project for deployment-independent settnigs. The advantage to a py
> file is that it would also handle the case of any computed settings
> that are required. We *could* have both, but that starts to seem
> overkill.
>
> Kevin
>
--
cheers
elvelind grandin
