Ian Bicking wrote: > > If you are thinking about RuleDispatch, you should probably consider > peak.security: http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/SecurityRules >
This in fact was already suggested by PJE, I opened a ticket some days ago: http://trac.turbogears.org/turbogears/ticket/313 > > Right now CherryPy is the blocker, and once it is working there I think > that should transfer to TG fairly easily, possibly (hopefully) even > retroactively (e.g., if you are running TG 0.9 with whatever version of > CherryPy where this is working). Right now CherryPy isn't offering a > sufficient WSGI-related API, and I don't know if that's because of > underlying architectural issues, or that the APIs just don't expose what > they should. > Just wondering if you have already seen last Fumanchu's reply to your questions on ticket #145: http://www.cherrypy.org/ticket/145 Ciao Michele
