On 1/17/06, Remi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI, this checkin in CP was just a proof of concept and it might very > well be removed from the trunk soon ... > So you shouldn't rely on this API.
Unfortunately, I had a monkeypatch in place for CP2.1 that did effectively the same thing. I can put the monkeypatch back if need be, though. Actually, if there's a reliable object path in the request, I likely wouldn't need the monkeypatch and can just have things set up in expose. Kevin
