What I'm not certain about with that path (and I do need to get back to those couple of tickets about better error handling) is that you can't easily toss validation errors back to the method that originally displayed the form. I'll take another look at those tickets sometime soon, though, and decide which (if any) solution makes it in 0.9. If nothing jumps out at me, I may defer this until sometime between 0.9 and 1.0.
Kevin On 1/13/06, Simon Belak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Like this? > > Thanks for the tip, > Simon > > > P.S. this is a re-send (from a different mail account) since my > original reply has not been delivered for more than 24h. > > Stephen Thorne wrote: > > > Excellent ideas! > > > > I'd recently become quite vexed at the error handling, especially when SQL > > errors occur. > > > > Could you repost that patch as a unified diff? `diff -u`, or a diff created > > using svn diff? > > > > You've managed to use diff's default behaviour, which is not-optimal for > > situations where others have changes in the same file. > > > > Thanks :) > > -- Kevin Dangoor Author of the Zesty News RSS newsreader email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] company: http://www.BlazingThings.com blog: http://www.BlueSkyOnMars.com
