On 1/23/06, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think we should blow this out of proportion. This is *one* > person's opinion. As a counterpoint, I also use both Django and > TurboGears. I started the Django project first and quite frankly, it > will be my last. I absolutely do not like Django. I'd rather have > TurboGears' growing pains than Django's convoluted file layout, > multitude of silly configuration requirements, etc. Deploying Django, > in general, is no easier than deploying TG, and further, requires two > *completely* different setups for development and deployment.
While I thought it useful to draw attention to this, I agree that we shouldn't blow it out of proportion. We've got a great thing going, and Jeremy's message in no way reduces my enthusiasm for 0.9. 0.9 is going to be an excellent release! Something I should say about my attitude toward things: I didn't actually say that Django or Rails are easier to deploy. I try to be less comparative and more absolute. In absolute terms, TurboGears deployment takes more effort than I think it needs to, regardless of what the other systems do or don't do. There *are* certainly times where I compare how we do things with how others do it, but I mostly just try to think of what we can do to make the experience better for people. Kevin
