My preference is for TinyMCE. I'm also against the inclusion of a WYSIWYG widget in TG, IMHO it should be a widget plugin once entry points for widgets are ready, this will give less bug on the TG core, no license problems for TG itself, and the ability to release a new version of the plugin any time the WYSIWYG component is updated without waiting for a new TG release.
As I've already said IMHO TG core should only ships with forms-oriented widgets, I think the same (plugin) applies for some (if we can call them so) AJAX-oriented widgets like the AutoCompleteField. Ciao Michele nerkles wrote: > Just want to second the idea that if one is to be included in TG, it > should be as cross-browser (and of course cross-platform, obviously) as > possible. > > In particular, it should support Safari (or at least intend to, AFAIK > none of them have it fully working yet). FCKEditor.com is getting close > to Safari support and is LGPL. Same with TinyMCE.
