On 2/2/06, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Indeed, including testing it integrated with different decorators and in > different orders of decorators, to be sure that 503 doesn't happen.
That is one hope for the new code: by maintaining the signature of the wrapped method, decorator ordering should matter less. (I won't say that it "won't matter", because some decorators may perform transformations that others won't like... but you get the idea...) Kevin
