Lee McFadden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The alternative to having to compile a template would be to subclass > of course. This is what I do, and when simply changing a template > it's never too onerous a task. By the time you've compiled your > template and made your widget instance I'm betting the amount of code > will be about the same, only the "modify the instance" method would be > less clear imho.
Hmmm... I have to think about it. Subclassing doesn't seem all that bad, but if it was possible to change the template passing either a file or a Kid template it would be really great (depending on the interface, it would also solve some problems and allow using other templating engines more easily...). Thanks for your help. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
