On Feb 7, 2006, at 6:58 PM, Michele Cella wrote:

If 4) is Kevin choice we should revert what Alberto has done (ops,
sorry Alberto :D), probably 4) is better if followed by any one since
it's not such a pain as reporting the entire signature, is less error
prone and does not break with every API change in the widget base class
(I'm already hearing Alberto screaming).

Ciao
Michele


Well, fortunately it wasn't much of a chore either, much easier than porting all the sample stuff for the browser after missing Kevin's post in which he said he was redoing all the widget-browser stuff... :)

Alberto

Reply via email to