On 2/7/06, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/7/06, Alberto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmmm, didn't think about that one.... and you're right. But what I > > mean is that, if posssible, list explicitly all the parameter we *do* > > know that our superclass' constructor needs as to aid people following > > the code (and ourselves ;) in knowing what's going on. > > I think that listing all of the superclass' parameters would get quite > tedious very quickly, and is probably not very useful it we can get > PythonDoc to create a link to the superclass __init__.
By the way, I don't see any need to change the __init__s that currently explicitly list out parameters. I was just saying that i don't think it's necessary. Kevin
