Simon Belak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Michele,
>
> added bind_args in r753:
>
> @bind_args(add=True)(error_handler)(clients)
If I try that, I get the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./start-siteamostras.py", line 24, in ?
from siteamostras.controllers import Root
File
"/home/godoy/empresa/clientes/latam/Site-Amostras/siteamostras/controllers.py",
line 18, in ?
from siteamostras.toxicologia import Toxicologia
File
"/home/godoy/empresa/clientes/latam/Site-Amostras/siteamostras/toxicologia.py",
line 28, in ?
import encaminhar_laudos
File
"/home/godoy/empresa/clientes/latam/Site-Amostras/siteamostras/encaminhar_laudos.py",
line 112
@turbogears.bind_args(add=True)(error_handler)(encaminharlaudos)
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> Syntax is a bit Lisp-y, I know. ;)
> ... but nothing some name-binding can't rectify.
>
> Give it a whirl when you have some time and tell me what you think.
I find it "counter intuitive" having parameters _before_ the function I'm
calling... I'd rather see the dictionary implementation suggested by Michele:
@turbogears.error_handler(method, arg1=value1, arg2=value2, argn=valuen)
This looks much more intuitive... But I dunno how hard it is to implement
that. Another options that would be more intuitive than using bing_args is:
@turbogears.error_handler(method)(arg1=value1, arg2=value2, argn=valuen)
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
