[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Did Kit and CherryPy also use an established license?
have you already forgotten that it was *you* who claimed that
they didn't ? shouldn't it be up to you to prove that you're right?
(it's not that hard to check things like this before posting, at
least if you have a working web browser and access to google ;-)
anyway, Kid uses a stock MIT license:
http://kid.lesscode.org/trac/wiki/KidLicense
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
just like it says on the Kid license page ("Kid is provided under
a MIT license")
as they say on their license page, CherryPy uses a stock BSD
license:
http://www.cherrypy.org/wiki/CherryPyLicense
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
BSD, MIT and the "historical permission notice" used by Element-
Tree and earlier versions of Python are all pretty much equivalent,
except that MIT doesn't have a no-endorsement clause.
</F>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
