That seems a little silly me to me, I can't think of any situations where I would want two tables holding the same data. Is it possible to make it so I can extend TG_User yet only end up with one table? I'd like to extend TG_User for forwards compatability reasons.
Also, on a related note, do identities require that the username field is called userId? I'd prefer my User class to follow my naming scheme used elsewhere in the site if possible. Cheers -Rob Max Ischenko wrote: >>Yes I did end up with two tables, >>with one holding a superset of the data in another. > > > That's perfectly OK and as expected. > > TG_User is declared as InheritableSQLObject and that's the way > inheritance works in SQLObject. > > Personally, I do not like it and create my own User class that does not > inherit from TG_User but merely copies some of the attributes used by > framework, like userId and emailAddress. > > HTH, > Max. // http://maxischenko.in.ua. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
