Michele Cella wrote:
>> In the template:
>>
>> <span py:for="risk in risks">
>> ${risk_widget.update_data(risk=risk).display()}
>> </span>
>
> Yep, that's perfect... ;-)
Okay, this is now done in revision 90! Fast Track should be a "good
citizen" now when it comes to widget usage, and there is no more than
one instance of each widget in the entire application :) However, I
had to do this instead of what I mentioned above:
<span py:for="risk in risks">
${risk_widget.display(risk=risk)}
</span>
... the update_data thing didn't seem to work for me, as it doesn't
return the instance, so I would have to do some hackery to get it to
work in a loop. I actually like the variant I went with better
anyway. Is this acceptable use?
I had forgotten a template in the previous revision as well, so if
you are using Fast Track, you might want to update your tree.
--
Jonathan LaCour
http://cleverdevil.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
