I wouldn't interperate this as "0.9a1 is twice as slow", you need to think more along the lines of "0.9a1 adds 0.007 seconds onto my processing time". It's not that bad.
I think if you did the same tests on pages that did real work you'd be pleasently surprised. -Rob venkatbo wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I ran an 'unscientific' test using both these versions... > > I created a simple app via: > tg-admin quickstart > under both versions. When I ran the non-db TG app under 0.8.9 it took > ~0.007 seconds to serve the static page, whereas under 0.9a1 it took > ~0.015 seconds... > > Does this imply that more complex dynamic apps, could be quite slower > under 0.9a1 as compared to 0.8.9 :?) > > /venkat > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
