I see. In that case I suggest using RhubarbTart[1].
Cheers, Simon [1] http://rhubarbtart.org/ Canis Lupus wrote: > Well... it's certainly minimal :) But it's not really what I'm looking > for -- if I make my own WSGI application and server combination, then > TK is bound to work with it :) as it will likely make the same > assumptions I did when writing the WSGI layer for TK. But it might not > work with other people's real systems, that use different corners of > the spec that I might've missed. > > What I need is a simple, complete, conforming server & application into > which I can drop TraceKnack and make sure TK doesn't break any of the > existing functionality. There must be some around. If not, it's OK, > I'll just wait for the WSGI-based TurboGears. > > Simon Belak wrote: >> This is probably as minimal as it gets: >> >> http://pythonpaste.org/do-it-yourself-framework.html >> >> Cheers, >> Simon > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
