Jorge Godoy wrote: > Simon Belak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The idea was we should not allow something as simple as an incomplete >> link resulting in errors (500). > > You mean missing parameters? If it is that, validators should be used to > avoid that as well. And for mandatory keywords you should provide no default, > so that you also get the error.
Missing, misspelled, obsolite, ... Throwing everything unexpected away is relatively safe and still saves some time. For me there is little appeal in a framework as heavy-weight as TG, if I still have to handle all eventualities myself. > > Aren't none of the error_handler and exception_handler decorators triggered by > this? exception_handler is. Cheers, Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
