Alberto Valverde wrote: > > On Apr 6, 2006, at 8:42 PM, Simon Belak wrote: > >> Super cool! >> >> Only thing I don't like is you are copying PEAK instead of linking it. >> You really should reconsider it. > > Yep, it's something I'm really feeling uneasy about... The orignal > implementaion linked to it, I decided to copy it for the opensourced > version to avoid extra dependencies for current TG users. > > The problem is that the only components of PEAK that are currently > needed (besides RuleDispatch which is already packaged separately) > are 'binding' and 'security' wich I estimate to be a 5% of the whole > package. > > TPS's version of 'security' already overrides 'hasPermission' with > your MultiOrderFunction so this is not much of a problem (though > that's what inheritance is all about). bindind is a literal > "copy&paste" and could really link to the original. > > I'd probably retract from this and live with the extra dep. (which I > have already in my machines).. probably whoever needs this also needs > other parts of PEAK so I realize it wasn't that wise of a decision :/ > I'll be changing this soon...
Maybe ask PJE if he would be willing to repackage PEAK a bit. Cheers, Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
