Elver Loho wrote: > /The following is meant as constructive criticism./ > > I've got a few things I'd like to do with TurboGears, but... > > There's a serious lack of documentation. I hear you're working on this > problem, which is good. What's the status on this one? And why not > adapt a Javadoc-like documentation system? PyGTK uses something like > this and it's excellent. Plus you can document as you code. >
I think Kevin is working on something that uses PythonDoc: effbot.org/zone/pythondoc.htm > The API for 0.8 is rather different from the API for 0.9. Which, > judging by some posts on the list here, is very different from what > 1.0 is going to be. I don't want to write something only to recode it > for a later API. When are you going to freeze it and what sort of > backwards-compatibility or upgrading help is planned? > No, 0.9 is already feature freezed (the focus is: bug fixing, doc and polishing existing things) and 1.0 will not be any different than 0.9 since the latter will become 1.0 when Kevin is happy with every aspect of it. Ciao Michele --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
