Em Sábado 22 Abril 2006 06:08, Patrick Lewis escreveu: > 1) The database relationships changed recently between the identity > tables (after 0.9a4). They use the ids now, which should make things > better in the future, and alleviate some of the pain you are feeling.
You got it reversed. We stopped with IDs ans stated with a hash. > 2) There is no rule saying you have to inherit from TG_User. It is > pretty easy to define your own base user class and link it into the > identity framework. I would agree with your general complaint that in > an ideal world, the base TG_User would be more lightweight. But, I > don't think it is that big of a burden really to set up a class that > does exactly what you would like, especially with the upcoming schema > changes. The idea is to use the base TG_User and *extend* it. To *reduce* you'd base your own class on it. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
