jvanasco wrote:
> Thats pretty much my sentiment too - unlike Robin though, I generally
> don't like to use autogenerated html for fields - just leave that up to
> the designer, and have them pull info from a dict.
>
> In TAL, its something like this:
> ===
> <div class="f_error" tal:condition="Errors/email"
> tal:content="Errors/email"/>
> <input type="text" name="email" value="" tal:attributes="value
> Defaults/_text/email"/>
> Please Note: We will send a confirmation email to this address your
> provide, and you must click on a unique confirmation link in that email
> it to complete your registration.
> ===
> Automagic generation saves time usually, but if there's some crazy
> complex layout - i leave it to the css/html people to handle the form
> placement.
>
> I'm looking forward to the .9a5 branch.  The widgets seem great for
> validation and , at times , for generation - but sometimes simplifying
> things like that just makes it complicated to do a complex html form.
>
> I'm glad to know that what I didn't like about TG's approach to forms
> can be ignored in .9a5

Actually (as I said on my last reply to Robin that I encourage you to
look at) there is nothing new in 0.9a5 regarding widgets, just bug
fixing and the rename of template_vars to params.

Hence you can already ignore what you're talking about if you're using
0.9a4.

Ciao
Michele


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to