Karl Guertin wrote: > On 4/25/06, isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> (it already seems to mostly work, based on some minimal poking around >> with it) > > I've done a fair amount of poking around with it. If you're just after > effects and drag & drop, it's acceptable. The codebase is a fair > amount larger than I think it needs to be, but it does work.
Eheh personally I would prefer a scriptaculous port of Mochikit. Or just plain old scriptaculous on its own. s.a.u is a fantastic library, and IMO much more suited to "Web2.0" application development than Mochikit. -Rob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
