On 5/23/06, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Em Terça 23 Maio 2006 11:13, Arnar Birgisson escreveu: > > > > Sounds doable, ActiveMapper is mostly syntactic sugar if I understand > > it correctly. > > It is doable. If you know SA you can do it fast. I was interested on trying > it for a project, but it took me more time than I had to invest and I planned > spending this time learning SA... So, you know what happened: I stopped just > a little bit after starting due to lack of knowledgement on SA... :-(
Wouldn't call me an expert, but I have studied SA a bit and feel up to the task. > > I originally had a working (though incomplete) sqlalchemy provider > > that didn't use ActiveMapper, and used the same table structure/naming > > as SO. It's a while since then though and things have probably > > changed, modifiying current soprovider will probably be easier. > > There's saprovider already. You just have to fix some table names and remove > the active mapper... I don't believe you'll have to rewrite it all again. Sorry, meant to say saprovider, the "o" was just a typo :o) > > I'll give it a try.. :o) > > Cool! And if you need some help, drop me a message... I can't help with SA, > but I can help with the rest (whatever that means ;-)). I'm sure I will need to.. :o) Arnar --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
