> - docs are close to zero.
One small point.
I'm sorry If you misundestood me there
I was refering strictly to TG and SA
I don't know about the docs that explain how to use
TG with SA but the SA docs themselves are remarkable -- really one of
the best examples I have seen of open source documentation.
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/
I haven't read 0.2 but I can back you up on the 0.1 read.
Steve
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- [TurboGears] SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Olli Wang
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Jorge Vargas
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Steve Zatz
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Jorge Vargas
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Andrew Grover
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Jorge Vargas
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Max Ischenko
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Robin Haswell
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? spacetaxi
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? mikl
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? spacetaxi
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLOb... mikl
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or S... Jonathan LaCour
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Kevin Dangoor

