On 6/8/06, Arnar Birgisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been looking at coding SA 0.2 support in TG whenever I can (which > hasn't been much lately). I sent Godoy patches for removing > ActiveMapper from the 0.1 code some time ago. > > If one uses the threadlocal mod in 0.2, going from 0.1 to 0.2 is > dead-easy. I could possibly post a patch for that today or tomorrow. > However, I've been struggling with the descision if that mod is > appropriate in a web-application. Mabey we should allocate a session > object to each request and use that instead. Has anyone thought about > this?
I haven't looked closely enough to say for sure, but I believe threadlocals are a good way to go for a webapp. TG offers implicit transactions at the request boundary and each request sits on its own thread. Basic database support should not involve sessions. Sessions make scaling trickier, so I wouldn't want to apply sessions to something as basic as db access. Besides, you really don't want database connections getting stuck an on individual user anyhow Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
