2006/6/14, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Javier Rojas wrote: > > > This is what I'd expect. In the second case, you're referring to the > name "add" before it has been created.
err.. sort of. I expect it to work like if I had two methods, and I call the second from the first. It works, despite of the second method being defined after the first one --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
