On Jun 15, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Jorge Vargas wrote:
> I agree 100% although i'll prefer hard to start but flexible then
> easy at start and then having to work around it.
>
I think you're missing some of the point, though... there's no
"working around" to do, per se. You could almost look at ActiveMapper
as an alternative syntax for defining Tables, that also happens to
give you objects that let you work directly with the database. If you
ever need to create your own Mappers you can... like Jonathan said,
you can get the Table object straight out of the ActiveMapper...
that was a generic statement, and it was more in line of ActiveMapper eventully growing bigger and becomming required instead of optional.
Kevin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
