> I had exactly that problem but my time frame was much smaller. Have you try this in a more intensive use, like ones every 5sec?
This should work no problem. Reducing the timeout value will have only a linear impact on your resource usage, ie 5 seconds will do twice as many checks as 10 seconds. But you will never run into a problem where the thread "restarts" over itself or anything like that. It processes everything it can, one batch at a time. The timeout is not actually strictly necessary at all. Assuming you do: processor.event.set() Whenever you have something for it to process, it should happen immediately. You could set it to wait indefinitely and it'll still process whenever you have data. I set a timeout because I'm paranoid, not because it's necessary. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
