On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Jorge Godoy wrote: > Donald Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> That would work, but the formatting for the polls and their results need >> to be easily customizable. That's far, far easier to do if I'm using kid >> templates than if I'm constructing the HTML tree client-side. My page >> designers can handle editing kid, asking them to edit javascript functions >> isn't realistic. >> >> (Also, stylistically, I mislike requiring a javascript interpreter to >> render the page. I like my webapps to still function in the absence of >> one. But that's just me being pedantic.) > > What I do here is using Kid's "fragment" option and then using innerHTML on > the JavaScript side. > > Something like: > > @turbogears.expose(fragment = True, html = > 'marketwatch.templates.some_example') > def fragment_returning_method(self, *args, **kwargs): > return dict(form = my_form)
that's a good solution. two questions occur. one, is there a way to choose to fragment dynamically? tg_fragment in the returned dict has no effect. also, is there a way to access the fragment datum from the kid template, so that i could use py:if and py:strip to inhibit chunks of the page if it's being rendered as a fragment? - donald --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
