Kevin Dangoor wrote: > > Actually, @view/expose already handles multiple types of responses > (not based on HTTP method but based on accept headers and tg_format). >
Yes, I know that that's why it makes sense to call it @respond IMHO. ;-) Anyway that's not a big problem just another idea to throw into the discussion. > > I think we should also move json.py and templates inside a common > > views > > subpackage. > > That is likely a good idea, but I think that's a good idea for later. > Yep, 1.1 probably. Ciao Michele --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
