Hi, Robin, Thanks for the comments. I'm just going to try to give you hope that the future will be better :) and ask a couple of questions.
> CherryPy > ======== > > It's slow and doesn't allow me the fine-grained control > I need for my web projects. FWIW, CP 3 (fast approaching beta) is about twice as fast as CP 2. I'd be very interested to know more about what you mean by "fine-grained control". Now is the time to get feature requests in. ;) > No obvious easy way to do URL rewriting. And no > controller.default() doesn't count. CP 3 will have full support for custom dispatchers, like Routes or Django-style regexes. > I think the sluggishness is mostly because it's written > in Python. Also I can't find a good way to let it handle > multiple requests at a time. I wrote an AJAX in-house > tool recently. It aggregates data from a website using > BeautifulSoup. There's an option to aggregate lots of data > at the same time, which it achieves by doing lots of > XMLHTTP requests. CherryPy doesn't seem happy with > doing more than 2 processes at a time, even with > thread_pool increased. There could also be a locking > issue. I'm pretty sure this isn't related to FF's > "max connections/server" features - I'm aware of > those. I know a similar PHP tool works fine. These are always hard to address because the locking issue might be completely outside of CherryPy; I've heard scattered reports of locking issues but haven't been able to reproduce them. If there's any way you could demo the problem, I'd be *very* glad to review it. C'mon back someday! Robert Brewer System Architect Amor Ministries [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
