"Tim Lesher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It doesn't appear that there's a problem using just "id" for PK > columns in SA (I'm doing it for my non-identity tables). Is there any > reason not to make the two implementations consistent?
IMHO it's a minor bug on the SA code. :-) They should be interchangeable in an ideal world and since SQLObject came first and is the officially supported ORM it is the reference. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
