> I think the idea is that there's a design difference between dojo, > yui, google toolkit, mochikit, prototype, zimbra and scriptaculous, > moofx (hrmph...library), PlotKit, etc. The former are used primarily > to build behavior while the latter are used primarily to add flash or > 'ajaxy goodness' to otherwise complete apps. Or at least that's how I > associate them. I think that scriptaculous is starting to push the > boundary with some of the new features but it retains most of its > roots as the frosting layer on the webapp cake.
This is the point I was trying to make. You can't directly compare scriptaculous with, say, Mochikit. Doug --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
