On 8/29/06, Sylvain Hellegouarch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which querying functionnality? ZODB has none. ZODB is a database not > even a full fledged OODBMS.
http://schevo.org/trac/wiki/SchevoPublicApi#query-methods-and-objects > Regarding storing objects, ZODB is limited to pickable object AFAIK What in the XML DTD or XML Schema can't be pickled? There are limitations on what can be pickled, but I don't think an OODB and XML are a terrible match. > My point anyway is not that your solution is not valid, simply it is > more a hack (a nice one certainly). It's a different approach. I certainly don't get good vibes going through CORBA or XML/RPC to access my database. If you prefer that, go for it. There are a whole lot of tools to work with xml and a lot of people really like it. I've given it a shot and decided the interoperability wasn't worth the effort of getting the xml ducks in a row. It's certainly not a bad approach, I'm just presenting a different one. > > I've paid my xml dues (I wrote a publishing system that was XML Schema > > validated and published with XSL-T) but it was a whole lot easier to > > rewrite that system in Python. Runs faster, too. > > > Faster than what? Than the XSL-T on sablotron. The main point is that it was a whole lot easier to write the system in Python than it was to do the Schema and XSL-T (mostly because XSL-T sucks). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
