"Eric Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think he meant "Why not make the *software* free (as in freedom), not just > service?" Sorry if I misunderstood what the original author meant. It was > very clear that the *service* is free, which is a good thing ;) Thanks!
I believe they have to pay for they bandwidth, effort, etc. If they release their software some competitor might easily compete with them. It is not uncommon for people to go after a 6 / 12 / 18 months margin and then start releasing old versions so that they contribute their knowledge but keep some advance to hold competitors back. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
