Jan Niklas Fingerle wrote: > I fail to see, why you shouldn't be able to have a primary or unique > key on (a,b,c) and a foreign key to a different table on (a,b). Please > explain. > I do exactly that, on reflected tables, and had no problem.
>> Usually, a hand-written schema is not as normalized as an ORM wishes, and >> even if it was, >> some pesky details usually get in your way. SQLAlchemy does not "wish" anything. I found it marvelous, and I never used an ORM in my life because I found them too restrictive. I would probably not have considered turbogears if there was only SQLObject. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
