On Sep 21, 2006, at 4:43 AM, gasolin wrote: > 1. "idenntity.require" broke the consistency usage of decorators, such > as @expose, @validate (no subfix)
I like Jorge's suggestion that you just use @require. > 3. "validate" and "validator" looked too similar and was easy to be > Jorge got it right on this one. > Some coin about @error_handler and @exception_handler, > > I think one of TurboGears advantage is hide the lower infrastructure > from developers, > but @xxx_handler let me feel "low" and changed my mind flow. > > 4. @error and @exception make sense for me and fit the decorators > naming consistency. I don't like the way @error and @exception read... that sounds more like a declaration of errors and exceptions that the method provides, rather than pointers to the handlers... Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
