Really bad news. :( Now I have to find an alternative solution. Gergo_
2006/9/25, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Oops... sorry about that. I missed the "I'm not allowed to open a port" part > of that sentence. You're absolutely right. > > I honestly have no idea if it can be deployed behind mod_python on apache > 1.3 > > Kevin > > > On Sep 24, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Gergely Major wrote: > Hi, > > maybe I've misunderstood something, but is it possible to use the the > mod_proxy solution without opening a port on the server? > I don't need mod_python, I just wanted to use it because in that case port > opening isn't needed. > > Gergo_ > > 2006/9/23, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The easiest solution (and the one recommended by the CherryPy folks, some > of whom also have a hosting company) is to use mod_proxy to talk to CP's > server. I'd recommend that route, unless you have a specific need for > mod_python. > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 23, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Gergely Major wrote: > > > > > > Hi list, > > > > I have to deploy my TG app behind an apache 1.3 webserver. I think using > mod_python (2.7 branch) is the best solution as I'm not allowed to open a > port on the server. > > I've found this site: > http://projects.amor.org/misc/wiki/ModPythonGateway , but > it seems that this mod_python handler is only available for the > apache2+mod_python3.1 combo. > > What do you recommend? Do you know about an apropriate handler or any > other deploying solution? > > > > Thank you for your answer: > > > > Gergo_ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
